Are Magnetic Generators Perpetual or a Scam?
The Internet is full of scams and that is why we need to be careful. Are Over Unity generators a scam? Are Zero Point Motors a scam Are Magnetic Motors a scam? Are Perpetual Motion Machines a scam? Did Magniwork and Magnets4Energy promote a scam?
Allow me help you. If I were promoting perpetual motion, over unity and something-for-nothing, that would be a fraud. There is no way you can make something for nothing. You can collect or convert energy from an existing force, however. There is a part of the humankind population continually looking for something-for-nothing and when they find something that looks like something-for-nothing they jump on it. Because this population views this science as something-for-nothing it does not mean the science is claiming something-for-nothing.
When folks thought the planet was flat, it took a sailor trying to go around the earth to confirm it round. Subsequently that, perspective changed, not the truth. This happens all the time. Science does not change only the explanation.
Magnets opposite poles attract. Move a strong magnet towards another's opposite pole and they will pull together. What is the force that moved them? Is this force perpetual? Can this force be used over and over again to do work? Before we in the scientific world completely understand magnetism, we can make false calms about it because we do not have a option. We merely don't know better. It's a mystery and it is human nature to apply rationale, even though the rationale could be incorrect. False claims ought not prevent us from using magnetism's force for work. Would not you agree?
Magniwork and Magnets4Energy are not selling perpetual motion in my opinion. They have implemented directions or guides to build a scientific experiment in magnetism.
About Author
You can read more about Magniwork and Magnets4Energy. Go To: www.ResidentialEnergyKit.com
by Woody Wilson
Advocate for homemade energy
How do I get through the rest of Kanto in Pokemon Heart Gold?
I can’t seem to find my through the rest of Kanto. I’m not allowed to go to Viridian City through Victory Road, I can’t yet enter Cerulean Cave and there are construction works blocking my way to Route 19. My friend asked if I had fixed the generator: yes, got the magnet train pass: yes, showed Bill’s grandpa the required Pokemon: yes, beaten the Elite Four: numerous times, fought Suicine: yes. He fainted, but yes. I have also been fighting all the gym leaders I can reach in Kanto. The only places I can’t get to are Seafoam Islands, Cinnabar Island, Pallet Town, Viridian City, Viridian Forest, DIGLETT’s Cave, Pewter City, Mt. Moon and Ceruclean Cave. My Kanto region map only has Cerulean City, Saffron City, Celadon City, Lavender Town, Vermillion City and Fuchsia City available. I’ve beaten all of those gyms. What do I do? This is frustrating and I’ve been working on it for weeks.
I’ve caught the Snorlax. Now what do I do?
OH! Nevermind! Thank you, guys.
Can you find the flaw in this perpetual motion idea?
A fixed magnet sits at the bottom of a hollow, non-conductive cylinder with its north pole turned upward (into the cylinder). Through a slot near the cylinder’s bottom, another magnet is inserted with its north pole turned downward. Magnetic repulsion pushes the two magnets apart. Since the bottom magnet is fixed, the other magnet must rise, thereby gaining gravitational potential energy.
When the rising magnet reaches the top of the cylinder, it gets toppled out and falls. The gravitational potential energy turns into kinetic energy. The magnet lands on a lever which turns a reciprocating handle on a generator. Each time the magnet lands on the lever, the handle turns once fully around, thus converting the kinetic energy into electricity.
The magnet tumbles back into the cylinder, again with the north pole facing down, and the cycle repeats.
Why can’t this continue indefinitely, with free energy being continuously extracted?
what kind of generator will produce high voltage?
we have a physics olympics a competition in school, we need to create a simple generator powered by hand.. the formula for the criteria is
score = (max volts generated) / (total weight of the device)..
my choices
generator 1
fix magnets and moving rotor inside
like this (( LllOlLl )) <–drawing
generator2
rotating magnet in a box with coil windings outside
in generator 2..
what settings of magnet will produce higher voltage?
1. i will use 1 rotating magnet and the flux will be cut by North and South pole of the magnet..
2. i will align array of magnets so that only one pole of the magnet will cut the flux of coil windings when it rotates… e.g. only North or South…
in wikipedia i read some articles, it says that using only one pole of array of magnets will cause lower voltage, is that true?
here is the link
“http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_generator#Faraday.27s_disk”
Faraday’s disk 3rd paragraph
please help me with these problems… i need every concepts and theories you know. tips and expertise..
thanks alot in advance.
in addition, the generator must produce electric current by using only magnets and conductive wires. by rotating a magnet in a coil of wire or by rotating a coil of wire between magnets… things like that. rotating things by hand using crank or lever.
Honestly, if VOLTAGE is your only concern, don’t bother with magnets, and go with something like a Van de Graaf generator. These types of generators simply use friction and a belt. Since magnets are heavy, replace that weight with some gearing to make a high velocity belt rub against a metal brush mounted in a coffee can. Although Van de Graafs can supply very little POWER, the VOLTAGES are around 10,000V.
Actually, rethinking the requirements, it may be difficult to build this thing with your resources in order to get the belt fast enough to really blow away the competition.
My next suggestion would then be a Lord Kelvin water drop generator:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3b23umXzPVA
Here you need only 3 buckets, two cans with the top and bottom cut off, and insulated wire. This, too, should get you in the 10kV range. You can easily demonstrate that you do all the work by hand, by manually lifting the bucket full of water to the height where you let it drain. Then two siphons or holes in the bottom of the bucket will let the water drain. One caveat here is that you would want to keep the amount of water used to a minimum, because water is heavy. Still, if everyone is thinking of a generator of a construction like you mention, no one is going to be close to the order of magnitude of your voltage, meaning your generator can be 100x heavier. Good luck.
———————————————————————–
Well, that’s stupid isn’t it–having a design competition where everyone has to use the same design–it’s like having a race where everyone is required jog . . .
So this is an AC generator I’m assuming. Here is a schematic for a permanent magnet generator:
http://www.scoraigwind.com/pmgbooklet/itpmg.pdf
Essentially there is only one equation you need to know and that is Faraday’s law of induction that:
V = -dΦ/dt
Where Φ is the magnetic flux. I don’t know what level of science this is for, but what it boils down to is that if you take a loop of wire and change the amount of magnetic field through it, you get a voltage. You can compound it by making a coil of n loops and you multiply that voltage by n, but keep in mind that as you increase the number of loops, the loops are also getting further from the magnet, so the field strength is dropping. So the main contributions are going to be STRENGTH of magnetic field, the SPEED at which you change the flux, and the NUMBER of loops in your coils. A basic design would be to drill an even number of holes along the outside of a cd and glue a bunch of neodynium disk magnets of alternating polarity inside the holes and spin that as fast as possible between sets of coils.
That would create a generator like this:
http://www.otherpower.com/hamster.html
Imagine a very small diameter axle through the cd (a pen say, or smaller) and a string wrapped around it. Pulling on the string as hard as you can without breaking it should get it spinning rapidly.
If you literally can’t use anything but wire and magnets, that would eliminate the use of the cd. In this case I would recommend dropping a heavy bar magnet through a large coil of wires. Again, the higher you can drop the magnet from, the faster it goes through the wires, the larger your voltage will be. This case may even produce a higher voltage than the above generator, but it will only produce a very large voltage for a very short time. This is the same design as the shake and charge flashlights. Depending on the type of measuring equipment available it may not be accurately resolved by the judges–if you are using a multimeter, say.
the power generator made up of entire magnet works?
u have seen a alternator it is made up of two parts the “coil n rotor”
can we fix a number of magnets in coil section and a number of magnets in the rotar section
in such a way that they repel or attract each, and allow the rotor to rotate without any other power or outer effort. i want to know wat happens if we do so.
whether it rotate or not if no why? if yes for how much time?
i hope what i want to say is clear to u all
Go to the lavender town radio tower and upgrade your pokegear. Then, using the pokeflute on your radio (you have to adjust it-it isn’t on one of the four channels) wake up the snorlax blocking your way.
Which of these simple setups of an AC electric generator is most common? Three choices, 10 points? Take 2?
I am researching AC electric generators, and have seen three different descriptions for the simple design. So I written these three choices up myself, and want to know which is most common:
A. Wire windings as stator, more coils of wires as rotor. Current fed to rotor, become electromagnet and produces magnetic field, rotates (through heat, wind etc) and induces current in stator windings which AC.
B. Permanent magnets as stator, coils of wires as rotor. Rotor rotates through heat, wind etc. and has AC current induced in it. Does not have commutator (ie. same setup as DC electric generator but no commutator).
C. Rotating permanent magnet (rotor), fixed windings as stator. Permanent magnet rotates through heat/other energy and induces current in fixed stators which AC. No commutator (ie. Same as B but rotating permanent magnet with fixed coils, not other way round).
NB. Stator = fixed, rotor = free to move.
I am writing a report on it, and I want to do the most common one of these three. Possibly best would be the one used in power stations to ‘generate’ domestic electricity. If possible, could you please tell me what that type of AC generator is called also after choosing A,B or C?
Thanks in advance. 10 points for best answer.
PS. I realise I have asked this question not long ago, but I didn’t explain it right. Thanks for your help once again.
In a DC electric generator, would B be the most common? Called a dynamo?
“A” is most common. It is the synchronous generator configuration that is used in power stations and most engine-generator sets. It is the basic configurations used in vehicle alternators except that alternators have a rectifier that converts their output to DC.
“B” As far as I know, this is not used as you describe it. It is not an accurate description of an induction generator. An induction generator has no magnets in the stator. It is the same machine as an induction motor. The rotor is a “squirrel cage” made of aluminum (or sometimes copper) bars that are shorted together on the ends with no external connection. The rotor is initially powered externally to induce current to flow in the rotor and produce a magnetic field in the rotor. The rotor field then generates current in the stator to sustain itself and supply power to the source. It works best as a means of supplying additional energy to an already powered electrical grid, but stand-alone systems can be operated with a battery and inverter system designed for the purpose.
“C” People modify vehicle alternators to this configuration by rebuilding the rotor to replace the sliprings and coils with electromagnets. They are used by amateur do-it-yourselfers for home power projects. There are also some small machines commercially manufactured in this configuration for various specialized purposes.
“When the rising magnet reaches the top of the cylinder, it gets toppled out and falls.”
“The magnet tumbles back into the cylinder”
How does that happen if the magnet has fallen from the top of the cylinder? Is there some side aperture in the cylinder above the inserted second magnet that you have not mentioned? What powers the insertion of the second magnet? How do you control which pole direction the tumbling magnet has when entering the cylinder?
The magnetic repulsion force varies inversely as the square of the distance between the magnets. This is most always less than the force imparted to the lever by the falling magnet.
This action should be performed in a vacuum chamber, as air resistance will rob the system of energy constantly.
fucking magnets, how do they work?