Magnetic Motion Machine

Creative inventor patents perpetual magnetic motion machine

Magnetic Perpetual Machine And What it Can Do

About Author
Pay Attention Here: If you interested in how to make a Magnetic Power Generation,I HIGHTLY recommend you a material call" Nikola Tesla Secret.I highly recommend it for any person wanting to build professional and integrated Magnetic Power Generation systems from scratch. Good luck!

Source: http://www.sooperarticles.com/home-improvement-articles/energy-efficiency-articles/magnetic-perpetual-machine-what-can-do-546385.html


This entry was posted in renewable energy and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to Magnetic Motion Machine

  1. madisonblly says:

    I want some good examples of a perpetual motion machine I have the answer.?
    Magnetic force is the key simple but no has done it magnetic force repels to create rotation if applied right the force could be harnessed to create rotation this constant frictionless rotation could be used with simple coils for electricity. This would be perpetual motion no outside energy required its like using gravity
    minimal outside or no outside help would be required. Give me ideas if you think your smart?

  2. Dr Greg says:

    perpetual motion machines my magnetism even in a frictionless vacuum region will not work.

    first of all, energy is lost due to hysteresis. no need to concern about heat losses from friction.

    and because of lenz’s law, any work you try to extract from the machine will lead to the slowdown of the machine because the magnet opposes its own movement.

    perpetual machines dont work because there is a concept known as entropy, which is listed in the laws of thermodynamics. as long as these laws stand, perpetual machines exist only in the universe of the mind.

  3. valcan says:

    Any thoughts towards a perpatual motion machine?
    I thought of wind&solar with a battery backup.
    I’ve considered using a natural source such-as gravational or magnetic forces.

    with both there is a point of balance also a point of optium force

  4. deman says:

    Need help with Perpetual motion Science fair?
    I need help with my science fair project it is on Wilkins’ Magnetic Perpetual Motion Machine if somebody would please write me a good reason why this will not work and in very high detail i will be very happy thank you.

  5. BobbyC24 says:

    I think there is a distinctive difference between a perpetual motion machine and a free energy device. The perpetual motion topic is one that seems to invoke a lot of emotion, with many people claiming it absolutely impossible. The heart of the matter is that we need to find new, cheaper and cleaner energy sources. There are energy sources all around us: Gravity, Sun, Magnetic fields from the Earth, Water, Tides, Rivers, etc…. Technically harnessing any of these will not give perpetual motion, but what they can offer is almost free energy. I say almost b/c of the fix/maintenance cost of any device.

    We are in incredible times here and I believe that the technology for “almost” free energy exists, much more than is publicized. If we open ourselves up to the fact that these types of devices are a possibility, then I feel the sky is the limit.

    An interesting person to look-up is Nikola Tesla…

  6. Ian says:

    Is it possible to create a perpetual motion machine?
    I was thinking about planet-sized machines. If you could make something big enough, would it have enough gravity and/or a magnetic field large enough to power a generating unit at it’s center?

  7. biire2u says:

    It comes down to the magnets strength only has a strong influence the closer a steel ball gets to it.

    This device is going on the premise that it takes less energy to roll a weight up the ramp and that the energy will spike up if you let gravity pull it almost straight down. This is the concept using some arbitrary numbers:
    If you have a 1kg steel ball on the bottom of a 10 meter long incline and the height of the incline is 1 meter, then it will only take 1/10th the amount of energy to roll the ball up the ramp. The force to raise a 1kg ball one meter high = 1 kg * 1m * 9.8 m/s^2 = 9.8 Newton.

    The amount of work is mathematically force x distance so 9.8N * 1 meter = 9.8 Joules of work in raising the ball one meter vertically.
    By putting the ball on the ramp with a 10% grade means it only needs 1/10th the force to push that 9.8N ball up the ramp , which is 0.98N

    So wilkins looked at it like that. He thought if you put the ball on the ramp and you had a magnet with, say a 5.0 Newton pull on it, that the magnet could pull on the ball which only requires a 0.98N pull to roll it up the ramp. And then once the ball got to the top of the ramp, pure gravity would take over and the ball which has 9.8N of gravitational force at the top of the ramp, would drop down thru the hole , since the magnet only has a 5 N pull and the gravity has a 9.8N pull.

    It’s almost credible except for the force to get that ball to roll up the ramp. It does only need 0.98N to roll up the ramp, but when that 5.0 N magnet is 10 meters away from the ball, the magnetic power falls off as the 1/SQUARE of the distance, not in a linear way. What this means is if you move the ball 10 meters away from the magnet it is 10 times the distance away from the magnet, but for the magnet you have to square the distance to measure the magnet fall off in power. Of course 10 squared is 100. So this says that the magnet at 10 meters away only has 1/100th the power as it does at 1 meter to the ball.

    So if the ball needs 0.98N to roll up the ramp, at the beginning of the ramp there is only 1/100th of that 5N magnet power available at that distance which is 5/100 =0.05 N of force.

    And since you need .98N to get the ball moving up the ramp, the magnet doesn’t have enough pull to get the ball moving up.

    But if you tried to outwit that and just use a much bigger magnet which would exceed that force, it still wouldn’t work. Suppose you used a magnet with 100N of force. At a distance of 10 meters the magnet would exert a force of 1/100th * 100N = 1 newton of force.

    So now you have 1 newton of force pulling the ball up the ramp because it only takes 0.98N to roll it up. But now the problem is at the drop point for the ball. The ball at the drop point still only has a 9.8N force from gravity to drop it down, but the magnet has a 100N force. This is much stronger than the gravity force the ball would get from dropping, so the ball is just sucked right up to the magnet instead of dropping.

  8. wjllope says:

    friction, viscosity, & air resistance/drag.

    if you can completely and perfectly avoid those things, then yes, the motion will be perpetual.

    the problem is however that you cannot avoid those things, try as you might….

    cheers

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*


*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>