Perpetual Motion Magnetic Motor - Say No To Huge Electricity Bills
Author: Mr. Pom
With the recession overshadowing us, and the fuel prices shooting up there is the energy consumption needs of people too that are parallel rising up giving people a lot to spend for when they have not enough income coming in. I have always thought that with out the electricity bills our expenditure would have reduced so much. Now this is made possible because of the concept of perpetual motion magnetic motor that has been developed.
The power generating companies have been completely against the production of these perpetual motion magnetic motor as this is what affects their sales. But the present has seen so many of these devices that are actually being used and a lot of people are growing aware of this.
These alternate sources of energy that are being used in the production of perpetual motion magnetic motor are indeed very interesting. It is the magnetic energy that is being used and this is done because there are several scientific facts regarding the poles and their repelling or attracting nature that is utilized to create the strong magnetic field. Once this field is created this energy is then converted to usable electrical energy. Based on the energy needs of your home you can build your perpetual motion magnetic motor.
There are several do it yourself guides that are available online that will help you through the process of building this perpetual motion magnetic motor. In most cases all the material that is used to build this device is readily available in and around us. If you have an unused microwave oven you have almost everything you want as you can use the parts to make the perpetual motion magnetic motor. This is why the building is relative very easy and cheap. This way the entire process brings a complete rest to your wallet making sure that you will save enough on what you are doing.
Article Source: http://www.articlesbase.com/home-improvement-articles/perpetual-motion-magnetic-motor-say-no-to-huge-electricity-bills-2057814.html
About the Author
Now Pay Close Attention Here-
Are you seriously looking for a proven way to save money on your electricity bills? You will be surprised to know that how easy it is to save money on electricity bills at Home by opting a renewable source of energy like Magnetic Energy, that will not only save your money but you will help in cleaning the environment. How i built a Magnetic Power Generator in a few hours at home? Click Here
Presently, magnetism is often described as due to the spin of an electron. If one electron spins in one direction, it will become a north-seeking pole and vice-versa. The monopoles are hypothetical, and they are predicted by GUT (Grand unification theory) and String Theory. I don’t see how magnetic monopoles will “solve all our energy concerns”. Probably, there must be some failed perpetual motion generator that failed because a magnet has two poles. Or perhaps the magnetic field of the monopole is stronger than many electromagnets, such that it can be used in generators.
However, the discovery of the monopoles will first indicate that another fraction of the Grand Unified Theory is correct. Another thing is that our present theory of how a magnet has a magnetic field will change, and a new theory has to be thought of for the reason why when a magnet is cut into two the two small pieces will still have a north and south seeking pole. Another theory must be able to explain why the monopoles are hard to detect.
You might want to do further research on this topic…
If I discovered magnetic monopoles, how will I have “broken the barrier for perpetual motion”?
I asked a question about magnetic monopoles and the answerer told me if I did, I will have “broken the barrier for perpetual motion and solved all of our energy concerns”? In what ways? Please explain. Thanks. I don’t think I will ever win a noble prize for this, but I’m just curious: how would this be such a momentous discovery?
Need help with Perpetual motion Science fair?
I need help with my science fair project it is on Wilkins’ Magnetic Perpetual Motion Machine if somebody would please write me a good reason why this will not work and in very high detail i will be very happy thank you.
It comes down to the magnets strength only has a strong influence the closer a steel ball gets to it.
This device is going on the premise that it takes less energy to roll a weight up the ramp and that the energy will spike up if you let gravity pull it almost straight down. This is the concept using some arbitrary numbers:
If you have a 1kg steel ball on the bottom of a 10 meter long incline and the height of the incline is 1 meter, then it will only take 1/10th the amount of energy to roll the ball up the ramp. The force to raise a 1kg ball one meter high = 1 kg * 1m * 9.8 m/s^2 = 9.8 Newton.
The amount of work is mathematically force x distance so 9.8N * 1 meter = 9.8 Joules of work in raising the ball one meter vertically.
By putting the ball on the ramp with a 10% grade means it only needs 1/10th the force to push that 9.8N ball up the ramp , which is 0.98N
So wilkins looked at it like that. He thought if you put the ball on the ramp and you had a magnet with, say a 5.0 Newton pull on it, that the magnet could pull on the ball which only requires a 0.98N pull to roll it up the ramp. And then once the ball got to the top of the ramp, pure gravity would take over and the ball which has 9.8N of gravitational force at the top of the ramp, would drop down thru the hole , since the magnet only has a 5 N pull and the gravity has a 9.8N pull.
It’s almost credible except for the force to get that ball to roll up the ramp. It does only need 0.98N to roll up the ramp, but when that 5.0 N magnet is 10 meters away from the ball, the magnetic power falls off as the 1/SQUARE of the distance, not in a linear way. What this means is if you move the ball 10 meters away from the magnet it is 10 times the distance away from the magnet, but for the magnet you have to square the distance to measure the magnet fall off in power. Of course 10 squared is 100. So this says that the magnet at 10 meters away only has 1/100th the power as it does at 1 meter to the ball.
So if the ball needs 0.98N to roll up the ramp, at the beginning of the ramp there is only 1/100th of that 5N magnet power available at that distance which is 5/100 =0.05 N of force.
And since you need .98N to get the ball moving up the ramp, the magnet doesn’t have enough pull to get the ball moving up.
But if you tried to outwit that and just use a much bigger magnet which would exceed that force, it still wouldn’t work. Suppose you used a magnet with 100N of force. At a distance of 10 meters the magnet would exert a force of 1/100th * 100N = 1 newton of force.
So now you have 1 newton of force pulling the ball up the ramp because it only takes 0.98N to roll it up. But now the problem is at the drop point for the ball. The ball at the drop point still only has a 9.8N force from gravity to drop it down, but the magnet has a 100N force. This is much stronger than the gravity force the ball would get from dropping, so the ball is just sucked right up to the magnet instead of dropping.
Could perpetual motion be possible with a circular Meissner effect controlled magnetic ‘windmill’ in space?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meissner_effect < Meissner effect.
So, if a magnetic superconductor maintains it’s magnetic charge when supercooled,and if placed in a frictionless environment with propulsory positively charged magnets on the outside with a propulsed negatively charged magnet on the inside, would we be able to harness perpetual motion?
In laymen’s terms, think of a donut. The outside would be positively charged and the negatively charged inside would line up to the rim next to the positive magnets. If the outside magnets were placed at an angle, the negative magnet would constantly swirl about the circle.
If in a friction filled environment, the negative/positive magnets would eventually wither away and emit some energy due to the friction that would be given off. If in a frictionless environment, (Space-vaccuum) then the magnets would remain in motion and would not wither away. (I think.) Could this be a possibility?
perpetual motion is it viable /a fact/ proven?
magnetic motion exploration .Any one with a sucessful theory or a proven product in the field.As a result of perpetual motion.
The USPTO says an invention must run 25 years without interference to be considered perpetual.
There are several perpetual motion machines. Bendini wheel, Thomas Beardon’s magnetic motor, Nicola Teslas’ 1930 pierce arrow, Professor John Searle’s SEG All magnetic. I have designed and patented an Electromagnetic Piston Motor and a Toroidal Inductance Generator. Not perpetual motion but….. over unity. The most obvious perpetual motion machine is the earth itself. It too is magnetic. It has spun on its axis and revolved around the sun for over 25 years. I personally can vouch for 46 years of continuous motion That quantifies it as such.
No, you only see one of several equations, when travel at speed of light time passage become zero but time intervals become infinite, inertial mass become infinite too, length at direction of travel become zero too, thus is impossible of matter travel even near speed of light, mass of material object increase exponentially and become too great of anything accelerate it more, perpetual motion is simply impossible and is impossible travel very near speed of light, this idea not work, it not consider all factors involved.
Theories on time travel and perpetual motion?
I know it’s not possible to travel back in time. But, could you theoretically travel to the future? I read some where that time would slow down for someone traveling close to the speed of light. If this theory is correct. Could you construct some sort of perpetual motion machine, to achieve these speeds? I’m thinking, maybe magnetic and in space, to reduce friction and air resistance.