How To Build a 50MPH Electric Bike
Search Amazon
More
Do It Yourself
Tunguska Tesla
Do It Yourself
© 2012 - RENEWABLE ENERGY REVIEWS | Proudly powered by WordPress. 2010 Weaver by WPWeaver.info |
© 2012 - RENEWABLE ENERGY REVIEWS | Proudly powered by WordPress. 2010 Weaver by WPWeaver.info |
Did Nicola Tesla cause the Tunguska exlosion in 1908 in Siberia?
An explosion occurs over Tunguska (in Siberia), Russia, which is heard for 620 miles around. Some speculate this could have been a test of Tesla’s energy weapon, in Tesla’s last attempt to get some more funding for his planet-wide wireless power transmission system. Some say it was a meteor or UFO crashing, but there was no crater. It flattened 500,000 acres of trees for miles around. It was equivalent to 10-15 megatons of TNT. Whole nomad villages disappeared.
tunguska blast / tesla death ray?
most people believe the tunguska blast was caused by a meteorite, however, there is no crater or fragment evidence. i believe tesla caused it while experimenting with a “death ray” from wardenclyfe tower while trying to signal robert perry (actually trying to create an artificial aurora boreallis). physicists argue this cannot be true due simple conservation of energy (energy in = energy out). this law is undeniable… however, i’ve been researching the contraversial project HAARP in alaska, in which it is beleived that a very small input energy tuned to the exact resonant frequency of the ionosphere is capable of producing a energy discharge millions of times the input hundreds of miles away. tesla was way ahead of his time and i think this is a legitimate theory that is currently being researched by the military. i would really like to hear serious comments from legitimate physicists. tesla had earlier created a oscillating “earthquake machine” that used a similar concept.
What is the feasibility of Tesla causing the Tunguska event?
I’ve been reading some stuff on the Tunguska event, and Tesla’s death ray, but are they related?
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ciencia/esp_ciencia_tunguska02.htm
I know that an aerial explosion is the “best” scientific explanation, but I’m asking if Tesla was actually to the point on his “death ray” to do it.
One of his projects consisted of bouncing electrical impulses through the ionosphere, and as the pulse went through, it gathered more and more energy. Every time it came back over, it was pushed again by another pulse, and Tesla supposedly overloaded the generators at the power plant in Colorado Springs because he was creating energy and sending it backwards.. But then again these are just stories.
Did Wardenclyffe Cause Tunguska?
7:17 AM on the morning of June 30, 1908, a mysterious explosion occurred in the skies over Siberia. 1000 x the power Hiroshima. Tesla, in March 1907, did state that he was capable of “projecting wave energy” and, in April 1908, Tesla expounds on the possibilities of “direct application of electrical waves without the use of aerial engines or other implements of destruction”.
It is not certain if Tesla ever used the Wardenclyffe facility for this manner. Reports of 1908 have Tesla testing the facility during Robert Peary’s second North Pole expedition. Reportedly, Tesla operated the Wardenclyffe facility to send enormous power to an area west of the Peary expedition. Tesla’s associate, George Scherff, witnessed these events at Wardenclyffe Tower. During the test, Wardenclyffe tower emitted a faint soft glow and killed an animal. Analysis of Peary’s position and Tunguska deviates by 2 degrees on a straight line from the Wardenclyffe facility.
The chief difficulty in the asteroid theory is that a stony object should have produced a large crater where it struck the ground, but no such crater has been found. It has been hypothesized that the passage of the asteroid through the atmosphere caused pressures and temperatures to build up to a point where the asteroid abruptly disintegrated in a huge explosion. The destruction would have had to be so complete that no remnants of substantial size survived, and the material scattered into the upper atmosphere during the explosion would have caused the skyglows. However, it remains an open question why the meteorite should have disintegrated so abruptly.
Electromagnetic effect
The Tunguska Event does appear to be similar to magnetic storms that occur after thermonuclear explosions (such as from a nuclear weapon) in the stratosphere. Anomalous concentrations of electrical energy in the region could have produced an explosive releases of energy. Electromagnetic fireballs, spherical plasmoids, and ball lightning have been reported to exhibit the same phenonomena. Other plasma and geomagnetic theories have been formed. V. K. Zhuravlev and A. N. Dmitriev, in 1984, proposes a “heliophysical” model that explains the Tunguska event as a result of plasmoids ejected from the Sun. Valeriy Buerakov also develops an independent model of an electromagnetic “ball” that could deliver such force.
Is it possible that the 1909 explosion in Tunguska was not an asteroid but…?
In 1909, Nicola Tesla was conducting wireless energy transmission experiments, a fore-runner to the government’s HAARP technology. Could the destruction which occurred in Tunguska, Siberia, have been the result of an experiment gone wrong, and is there the possibility that the same mistake could occur again if the government is allowed to employ the HAARP technology?
Interesting you should mention this explosion.
I say this, because this explosion, that almost nobody has heard of, is one more very strange incidence of (supposedly reliable) carbon dating giving a ridiculously false result.
When the wood from the trees burned by this explosion was carbon dated, it gave a date in the FUTURE! It’s age was negative! It hadn’t happened yet!
This is even worse than the mammoth that was “dated” using carbon dating and the result of the test showed that the tail of the animal was 15,000 years younger than the head! So much for any presumption of such dating methods being reliable!
Those of us in the creationist community are well aware that carbon dating (and all of the other radiometric “dating” methods) are far from reliable, and routinely give all kind of ridiculously differing results for the SAME specimen (rock).
When different dating methods are used to “date” the same rock or fossil, they get very different results (wildly different, all over the map, from hundreds of billions of years to no age at all (just created, zero years old).
If any of these methods were reliable, then at least ONE of them, when used to date a specimen, should produce the same result every time the specimen is dated. But none of them has ever been shown to be consistently reliable, or even close.
Compare this to, say, any method used to determine the salinity of a certain sample of water. Different methods should all give a very similar answer (within the degree of error of measurement).
But the different kinds of radiometric dating methods are all over the place, so a researcher has to pretty much guess how old he thinks it should be.
The radiometric dating methods that supposedly “prove” the earth is billions of years old, or that some fossil is millions of years old, are all highly suspect and fallible, and partly this is because they are based on highly fallible, suspect and unproven assumptions that those testing them start out with.
If you start with the wrong idea about how old something is, and make certain other unprovable assumptions (such as that the rates of decay have always been the same, that none of the radioactive element has been washed in or out since the decay began, etc.), then you necessarily will end up with wrong “dates” or “ages” for said samples.
So how do they arrive at a date or an age?. . Basically they ask, ‘well how old should something in this strata be”? (and if they think it should be 2.5 million years old, then that’s the “age” that is published in the headlines the next month, never mind that it’s very likely WAY off, usually by an order of magnitude)>
This is, in fact, how it’s actually done.
Here’s my thought concerning the oscillating “earthquake machine”: it’s highly unlikely. The only way they could produce that much energy is to build something so massive that is would take up at least half of the US or have something move the speed pf light but according to Einstein’s relativity it would turn into energy.
no. A body hit erth, maby meteor or komet.
best theeree is the body sploded bout 1 mile abuv surfus.
Not really.
There *were* witnesses to the Tunguska event. People in “nearby” towns saw the fireball track across the sky, heard the blast, and were even knocked down by the shock wave from the burst. It was only due to the remote location, bad science and marketing spin that this is was ever a “mysterious” event.
I’m not familiar with the case that you’re talking about. However, geological evidence has linked the Tunguska Event to the explosion of a meteoroid in earth’s atmosphere. This is the conclusion generally considered to be correct by the majority of the scientific community.
The idea that any human could have brought about such a tremendous explosion is extremely unlikely. To date, the only method that humanity has been able to devise for creating such an explosion is the nuclear weapon. If there were another way – especially a way that was possible using only 1908 technology and recommended by Tesla – it would have been discovered and made public in the intervening years.